Colors, formatting
This commit is contained in:
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ Let's talk about kink.
|
||||
Let's fucking not.
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
|
||||
I won't repost them, because they're direct logs, shortly after the conversation mentioned before, the issue of Michael bringing another partner to the queer group we were a part of came up. How would we work a situation where I, coming from a monogamous point of view, would be in the same room with my partner and metamour? Would we split our time? Would one of us get ignored while the other got attention? Would we both get attention? Would we just plain avoid it?
|
||||
\noindent I won't repost them, because they're direct logs, shortly after the conversation mentioned before, the issue of Michael bringing another partner to the queer group we were a part of came up. How would we work a situation where I, coming from a monogamous point of view, would be in the same room with my partner and metamour? Would we split our time? Would one of us get ignored while the other got attention? Would we both get attention? Would we just plain avoid it?
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{ally}
|
||||
It's surreal, even for me, to hear you talk about this today, given your current situation.
|
||||
@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ Probably not.
|
||||
Yeah, probably not.
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
|
||||
Relationship anarchy, as a topic, seems to draw heavily from both poly folks and queer folks. In fact, the three ideas are so heavily intertwined that it's difficult to have one without the others. Poly? Well, there's a good chance that there are some queer aspects to your relationship.
|
||||
\noindent Relationship anarchy, as a topic, seems to draw heavily from both poly folks and queer folks. In fact, the three ideas are so heavily intertwined that it's difficult to have one without the others. Poly? Well, there's a good chance that there are some queer aspects to your relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
And if you're queer and at least of a certain age, relationship anarchy is baked into your soul. If your society sets up a ``natural'' relationship progression and then bars an entire class from entry to that progression, subversive and transgressive relationship structures form as a matter of course.
|
||||
|
||||
@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ Why do you bring this up? You're not writing an article. Out with it.
|
||||
Right.
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
|
||||
If poly is queer, in that it's not relationship-normative, then I'm queer. If being trans is queer because it's not gender-normative, then I'm queer. If my identity blurs lines, then I'm queer.
|
||||
\noindent If poly is queer, in that it's not relationship-normative, then I'm queer. If being trans is queer because it's not gender-normative, then I'm queer. If my identity blurs lines, then I'm queer.
|
||||
|
||||
If I'm in a relationship with someone, then, is that a queer relationship? Is my partner queer?
|
||||
|
||||
@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ Yes, but you all spoke queer. None of you really spoke normative, a skill you're
|
||||
\end{ally}
|
||||
\newpage
|
||||
|
||||
I've been married for seven years. Robin and I have been together for more than five. My polycule has grown steadily over the years, and I have to wonder: how much of my polyamory, my relationship anarchy is a coping mechanism for how I was raised?
|
||||
\noindent I've been married for seven years. Robin and I have been together for more than five. My polycule has grown steadily over the years, and I have to wonder: how much of my polyamory, my relationship anarchy is a coping mechanism for how I was raised?
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{ally}
|
||||
Does it matter?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user