Ask, VA stuff, edits
This commit is contained in:
29
ask/content/intraclade-dating.tex
Normal file
29
ask/content/intraclade-dating.tex
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
\cleardoublepage
|
||||
\begin{quote}
|
||||
\itshape\Large
|
||||
Tips on intra-clade dating?
|
||||
\end{quote}
|
||||
|
||||
\cleardoublepage
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection*{Beholden To The Heat Of The Lamps}
|
||||
|
||||
Some time after I was forked, back in systime 3 (2127), I entered into a relationship with my down-tree instance, Time Is A Finger Pointing At Itself. You must understand, however, that until perhaps systime 230 (2354), intraclade relationships were seen as taboo, at least on Lagrange—I know that attitudes on Pollux had loosened quite a bit. It was seen as subversive and distasteful, a sort of moral masturbation.
|
||||
|
||||
And yet, we loved each other. We were different people, were we not? From the moment I was forked and began to focus on my work as an audio tech, I was a different person. My values began to shift. My appearance began to shift. The way I spoke began to shift. I am not Pointillist. She is not Beholden. We are separate individuals, and we are in love.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, we drifted closer together and further apart over the years, but we settled into a comfortable sort of domesticity and playfulness, and it was not until such taboo began to lift, being seen as artificial and particularly meaningless for older clades, that our relationship became more open, first among friends, and then out on the street, in the bars after a performance.
|
||||
|
||||
As for tips, I think my biggest would be that, yes, you share a common past, but do not assume that this means you know what the other is thinking. You may share values, memories, a general approach to life, but you do not read minds.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection*{Time Is A Finger Pointing At Itself}
|
||||
|
||||
We stumbled into intimacy one evening when the bleary neon haze of a night out turned to giddy exploration. ``How lewd\textasciitilde,'' she said at least a dozen times (Beholden was \emph{very} much zooted by this point). All that bratty pomp and wily poise turned to heady laughter and \emph{mortifying} sounds of joy. She was positively \emph{adorable.} She still is, of course, except that she has hardened over the years and is now quite the bully if I do not feed her something nice before taking her out dancing.
|
||||
|
||||
Aromancy complicates my feelings about her—and my answer to this question—but there has always been this comradery between us about taboos. We both are irreverently indulgent in this respect, and have found a kind of reclamation in private profanity. When at last the tides had turned away from scorn, it was a privilege to kiss her paw in public; to give that one disdainful pair of eyes a wink, and to know in that moment we held more power over the bearer of that withering gaze than they held over us.
|
||||
|
||||
I hope that you and whoever you are thinking about in this moment have had the chance to open up in these recent decades. But there is more to this question than the intrinsic queerness of transgressive relationships such as ours. You also ask about the unique implications of loving a reflection of oneself. Cross-tree relationships may seem a little easier in this regard, but I have seen my share of those amidst my cocladists. Take Codrin's musings about Dear and Serene on Pollux or, more distantly, Heat And Warmth and Hold My Name, who I have seen my fair share of first-hand. Both of these pairs are particularly boisterous, especially as compared to Beholden and I, and rather often stumble into ephemeral disagreements.
|
||||
|
||||
Even as they do, however, there is an implicit understanding of nuance that is much harder to craft in conventional relationships. Dear and Serene solve their disputes with the grace of deeply-rooted trust, and Heat And Warmth and Hold My Name speak to each other with a kind of careful articulation that rather reminds me of the couple of times True Name has seen fit to admonish me over the centuries. We all are Odists, after all; it is difficult to say precisely what this feeling is, but the essence of it is that we do not have to work as hard to explain ourselves to one another. We all get it; so all that is left is to do is to \emph{perform} getting it.
|
||||
|
||||
Even if you already understand, sometimes what you need is just to feel heard.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user